Economy
US blacklists Chinese firms over links to Iranian regime's military programs
The US Department of Commerce has sanctioned six Chinese firms for aiding Iran’s drone and weapons of mass destruction programs.
By Pishtaz |
The US Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) sanctioned six Chinese companies on October 21 for "activities contrary to US national security and foreign policy."
The move came as part of a wider tranche of sanctions that also targeted entities in Egypt, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
In total, the bureau listed 26 entities accused of violating export controls, involvement in weapons programs of concern, and evasion of US sanctions and export controls on Russia and Iran.
The six Chinese firms were added for acquiring US-origin items in support of China's military modernization and for "dilatory and evasive conduct during end-use checks," it said in a statement.
They also are accused of "procurement of US-origin items for Iran’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) programs," it said.
“We are vigilant in defending US national security from bad actors who seek to evade US sanctions and export controls,” said Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Alan F. Estevez.
The sanctions "send a message to malicious actors that if they violate our controls, they will pay a price," he said.
Facilitating Houthis' attacks
The move "sheds light on the complex web of global supply chains that Moscow and Tehran are using to circumvent Western sanctions and export restrictions in their race to bulk up their militaries," per an October 21 Politico report.
The BIS blacklisting follows US Treasury sanctions rolled out October 2 on key procurement operatives and suppliers in Iran and China who have helped the Houthis manufacture, maintain and deploy advanced missiles and drones.
The Houthis use a network of international shipping and logistics companies to transport military-grade components from third-country suppliers to their forces in Yemen, the Treasury said.
They source these items from a range of China-based companies, including logistics and international shipping firm Shenzhen Boyu Imports and Exports Co., Limited, which has facilitated multiple shipments to the Houthis, it said.
Analysts note that China has been a key beneficiary of the Iran-backed Houthis' attacks in the Red Sea, as Chinese shipping companies operate with near-total immunity thanks to their "special relationship" with the militant group.
In January, the Houthis promised Chinese and Russian ships safe passage through the Red Sea -- though they went on to hit ships linked to both nations with missiles, likely in error.
Even so, the Houthis' selective targeting has allowed Chinese ships to navigate the Red Sea with fewer interruptions compared to other nations' vessels.
Israel and those who wish ill for Islamic Iran must be destroyed, America must leave the Middle East.
It was good.
Our truth will take the leadership by word.
Thanks for the media news.
In the name of Allah
Greetings to our dear leader, the Commander and rightful Deputy of Imam Mahdi (may God hasten his reappearance). With a brief exploration into Islamic history, I would like to share my thoughts regarding the “Wa’da Sadiq 3” (Promise of Truth 3). Mukhtar al-Thaqafi, in seeking revenge for Imam Hussein (peace be upon him), took a diplomatic approach by pledging allegiance to the House of Zubayr, who—under the guise of hypocrisy—were sheltered in Mecca and falsely displayed hostility toward the Umayyads while feigning love for the followers of Ali. Mukhtar made a political misstep to dispel suspicion from the Zubayr ruler, stipulating a condition to govern Arab Iraq. Given the naive and radical ideas of the Tawwabin, there was a clear risk that Mukhtar’s main purpose could be undermined, leading to the Arab tribal leaders’ reluctance to support his cause. On the other hand, if he abandoned the condition of governing Arab Iraq, a greater threat awaited him, as it would result in confronting two fronts simultaneously: the Umayyad rule in Sham (Syria) and the Zubayr rule in Mecca, which would likely lead to his defeat. In conclusion, if we now view “Wa’da Sadiq 3” as Mukhtar’s conditional claim over Arab Iraq, then retreating from or failing to fulfill “Wa’da Sadiq 3” will bear consequences similar to Mukhtar abandoning his claim to govern Iraq. From a strategic standpoint, this would destabilize our nation’s power against its sworn enemies. Therefore, Operation
Very good
If all Muslims pretend Laïcité and even if we win, this war will have its consequences. Israel is a nobody. Think who is controlling the world. That’s all. then do whatever you want. In every age, some people have power. Now it is Zion, and someone should manage these rabid wolves with wisdom. That’s it.
It's great.